Every year, our scientists and patient advisory group identify the studies and topics creating the most impact for people living with arthritis.
Uncover Our Focus for 2026Ongoing and completed studies across our full research portfolio, from prevention and treatment to care and health systems.
Explore Our ResearchMeet the scientists, clinicians, trainees, and patient advisory board members, driving discoveries
Meet Our TeamArthritis Research Canada's scientists and trainees regularly present new findings that advance arthritis prevention, treatment, and care.
Browse Conference AbstractsPeople living with arthritis guide our research priorities, shape study design, and ensure our work reflects real life.
Support Arthritis Research Canada with your time and skills. Whether you want to help at an event or host your own, there is a place for you here.
Living with arthritis? Explore open studies looking for participants and help shape the future of arthritis care.
Your experience with arthritis matters. Sharing it helps others feel less alone and brings the human reality of arthritis into everything we do.
Reason For Research
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis in children. It is important that children get diagnosis and treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis as early as possible. The Arthritis Alliance of Canada (AAC), an organization of over 36 Canadian arthritis stakeholder groups, developed ‘Models of Care for Inflammatory Arthritis’. The Models of Care highlight best practices for early diagnosis and treatment using a set of quality measures for inflammatory forms of arthritis. These measures can be used to test the success of care models. We did this study because we wanted to look at two of these quality measures that are specific to juvenile idiopathic arthritis care.
Execution of Research
We used Manitoba’s provincial administrative health records to find children under 16 years who were diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis between 2005 and 2015. We then checked two measures:
1) The percentage of kids who saw a pediatric rheumatologist within the first year after their diagnosis, and
2) How many of these kids had at least one follow-up visit with the specialist every year.
We also looked at how many times there were long gaps between visits, gaps of more than 12 or 14 months.